Knowing that your ancestor came from Scotland, Ireland, or another country is only the beginning. Records created after immigration may help narrow their origin to the town, parish, village, or even farm you need to find.
“My ancestor came from New Zealand.”
Good start.
Where in New Zealand?
“New Zealand.”
We’re going to need a little more than that.
Country of origin is useful, but it usually isn’t specific enough to begin serious research overseas. Scotland, Ireland, England, New Zealand, Germany, and other countries had thousands of parishes, villages, estates, farms, and towns. Searching an entire country for one person can produce a mountain of records and very little confidence that any of them belong to your family.
Before I spend much time searching overseas records, I want to narrow down the location as much as possible.
Start Where the Family Settled
The best clue to an immigrant’s birthplace may be sitting in records created after immigration.
Death records, obituaries, naturalization papers, church records, military records, marriage records, passenger lists, probate files, and newspaper notices may give a county, parish, town, or village.
Later census records can help too, although they often give only the country. Don’t stop with the immigrant.
Research the spouse, children, siblings, and other relatives. One person may have a death certificate that says only “England,” while a brother’s obituary names the exact parish.
I’ve had research problems move forward because a sibling left a better record than the person I was actually researching.
Look at the People Who Came With Them
Immigrants rarely appeared in a new place with no connections at all. They may have traveled with relatives, joined people they already knew, married into another family from the same area, or settled near people from home.
If several families from Ireland appear together in Nova Scotia, Pennsylvania, or another destination, I want to know where those other families came from too.
A neighbor’s birthplace may eventually help identify your ancestor’s.
This is one reason I pay attention to witnesses, sponsors, adjoining landowners, and people who keep appearing in the same records.
Learn the Geography Before You Search
Old place names can be confusing.
A record may give a parish, but the family actually lived on a farm or estate within that parish. Another source may use the farm name instead of the parish. A nearby village may be the place mentioned in later records.
That can make records look unrelated when they are describing the same small area. Maps, gazetteers, estate records, parish histories, and place-name references can help sort this out. Knowing that two tiny places were only a short distance apart can change how you read the evidence.
It can also help you avoid rejecting a record because the place name looks unfamiliar.
Tiny Places Can Be Better Clues Than Big Ones
A county may still contain many people with the same surname. A farm name is much narrower.
If your ancestor is repeatedly associated with one estate, village, or small locality, pay attention to it. Those names may show up in church registers, tax records, estate papers, leases, rentals, maps, and records involving neighboring families.
In Scottish research especially, a small locality can be far more useful than a broad statement such as “born in Ross-shire.”
The smaller the place, the more focused your search becomes.
Be Careful With Online Trees
Online family trees can be helpful for ideas, but a precise birthplace with no source deserves caution. A tree may say someone was born in a particular parish because another person with the same name was baptized there.
That does not make it correct.
Before using a birthplace from someone else’s tree, make sure you know where it came from. If there is no record, citation, family document, or explanation behind it, treat it as a clue.
Not as a fact.
Search the Family Before You Search the Country
If you know only that your ancestor came from Scotland, Ireland, or another country, spend more time on the records created where the family later lived.
Look for the sibling who lived longer. Look for the child whose death record gives more detail. Check the church the family joined. Read the obituary. Look at naturalization records. Follow the neighbors and relatives who migrated with them.
One good place name can save hours of searching overseas.
“Born in New Zealand” gives you an enormous search area.
“From Lambton in Wellington” gives you somewhere to start looking.
Prime: Free 30-day trial for eligible new members, plus all the benefits of Prime. https://amzn.to/4rFoiRk
When we think about property ownership today, we imagine stacks of paperwork—deeds, mortgages, and legal agreements. But land records have existed for centuries, and they can be a goldmine for genealogy research!
Our ancestors had different ways of acquiring land depending on the time period and location. These land records can reveal family relationships, migration patterns, and even social status. If you’re tracing your family tree, understanding historical land records can provide valuable clues.
Let’s explore some key types of land records, their time periods, and the survey systems used to document them.
Headrights (1619–1705)
Survey System: Metes and Bounds
During the Colonial period, the British government encouraged settlement by granting headrights—50 acres of land for each person transported to the American colonies. This system rewarded those who paid for the passage of immigrants, including family members, indentured servants, and enslaved people.
Why These Records Matter:
Lists the names of transported individuals and their sponsors.
Helps identify migration patterns and possible family connections.
Shows who had the means to sponsor others, indicating social standing.
Headright lands were recorded using the Metes and Bounds survey system, which used natural landmarks (rivers, trees, and stones) to describe property boundaries. Because landmarks change over time, this system can sometimes be tricky for modern researchers.
Bounty Land Warrants (1776–1856)
Survey System: State-Specific or Public Land Survey System (PLSS)
To encourage military service, the Continental Congress and later the U.S. government awarded bounty land to soldiers who fought in wars, from the Revolutionary War to the Mexican-American War. Depending on rank and service, veterans (or their heirs) could receive between 50 and 1,000 acres.
Why These Records Matter:
May include military service details and heirs’ names.
Shows how land ownership expanded into new territories.
Even if an ancestor sold their claim, their name still appears in the records.
Early bounty land states used their own survey methods, but by the 1800s, many switched to the Public Land Survey System (PLSS)—a grid-based system dividing land into townships and sections, making records easier to trace today.
Land Patents and Homesteading (1788–1930s)
Survey System: Public Land Survey System (PLSS)
The U.S. and state governments used land grants and homesteading laws to encourage westward expansion. The Homestead Act of 1862 offered 160 acres of free land to settlers who lived on it and improved it for five years. Once requirements were met, the government issued a land patent, officially transferring ownership.
Why These Records Matter:
Shows migration westward and settlement patterns.
Provides names, dates, and sometimes family details.
Includes applications, proving a person’s presence in a specific place.
These lands were surveyed using PLSS, a system dividing land into square-mile sections, making it more structured than the Metes and Bounds system used in the east.
Deeds (1600s–Present)
Survey System: Metes and Bounds (East), PLSS (West)
Property deeds record land transfers between private individuals. Most deeds were created in local courts and contain valuable information, including:
Names of buyers and sellers.
Exact property descriptions.
Clues about family relationships (such as land passing between relatives).
If land was sold at a very low price, it might have been a gift to a family member. Some deeds even specify inheritance rights. This makes deeds essential for genealogy research, especially in areas without early birth or death records.
Dower Claims (1600s–Early 1900s)
Survey System: Metes and Bounds or PLSS, depending on location
In most of early American history, men were the legal property owners. However, a widow had a dower right, meaning she was entitled to one-third of her deceased husband’s property for her lifetime. If she remarried or passed away, the land was typically passed to the husband’s heirs.
Why These Records Matter:
Identifies widows, a key detail when researching female ancestors.
Provides family inheritance information.
Often recorded in probate records and land deeds.
Other Land Records to Consider
Quitclaim Deeds – Used to transfer property between family members without guarantees of ownership.
Tax Records – Show who owned land and when, useful in cases where deed records are missing.
Land Grants – Given by Spanish, French, and Mexican governments before U.S. ownership of certain territories.
Conclusion
Land records are some of the oldest and most valuable resources in genealogy. Whether your ancestors acquired land through a headright, military service, homesteading, or purchase, these documents can help fill in gaps in your family history.
Understanding the survey system used in each time period—whether the natural boundary descriptions of Metes and Bounds or the structured township grids of PLSS—can also help you locate ancestral land with greater accuracy.
If you’re just starting out, try searching for land patents and deeds in the counties where your ancestors lived. You might be surprised at what you uncover!
Need more help? Visit the Loganalogy.com Research Specialist page! I offer guidance to streamline your research, provide expert tips, and help you build a family tree that future generations will cherish.
🔎 Want more genealogy tips? Check out my other blogs.
Mat Stephanz’s story begins in Kansas City, where he lived from birth until his marriage to Clara in 1920. His journey also included service in the Navy, but where did his family come from? How did they settle in Kansas City?
To uncover this, I started with his last known residence and the most recent record I could access: his Social Security Application. You might have guessed I’d say his death certificate, but because that record is over 50 years old, it’s only available through a family member—possibly among my great aunt’s possessions.
The Social Security Application confirmed that Mathias Stephanz and Mary Svegel were Mat’s parents. This wasn’t entirely new information; family trees from my Uncle’s and a paper trail from Clara or Mat had suggested it. However, in genealogy, documentation is key to verifying claims.
For privacy, I edited the document to exclude Mat’s Social Security number.
Knowing his parents’ names wasn’t enough to trace their origins. Census records and connections to Kansas City’s Strawberry Hill provided further clues. The 1900 census listed both Mathias and Mary’s birthplace as “Austria,” while the 1910 census specified “Austria Germany.” According to Marshall’s research, they hailed from Črnomelj, Austria (modern-day Slovenia).
With this foundation, I found more census records: Mathias Štefanc appears in the 1920 and 1930 records, while Mary’s entries span 1920, 1930, and 1940. These documents revealed more about their lives: Mathias’s naturalization in 1900 and the fact that he didn’t finish school. Each census offered a glimpse into their journey as immigrants building a life in a new land.
One interesting article was written by a genealogical cousin, Peter Hawlina.
Slovenia by Peter Hawlina
Slovenia has been an independent country since 1991. Before this, it was a part of Tito’s Yugoslavia. Prior to the second world war it was part of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes. Until the end of the first world war, it belonged to the Austrian Habsburg monarchy for centuries but also for a short time was under the direction of Napoleonic France. More than one thousand years ago the Slovenians lived in a Slavic empire led by King Samo. A more curious reader can read more about this in other publications. As an illustration, I will name just one example from modern history.
My sister was born in 1940 in the kingdom of Yugoslavia. I was born in 1941 under the Italian occupation in Italy. My brother was born in 1943 in Germany after the Italians capitulated, while my next sister was born in 1945 in the Federal Socialist Republic of Yugoslavia. We all were born in the same house in the suburbs of Ljubljana, so it is important for a genealogist to be aware of the fact that there were changing religious and civil jurisdictions at various times. These changes are of critical importance when conducting this research. I will not go into details but I will mention those characteristics that would be helpful to the inexperienced researcher.
The local parish church is dedicated to Saint Joseph and belongs to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Novo Mesto. Records from there are Status Animarum Records.
Status Animarum translates as “the state of souls.” They contain names and information about baptism, marriage, burial, and relationship to head of household for everyone living in a parish by house number. Spouses often show the town and house where they were born or moved. They were kept by the parish priests for internal purposes. Handwriting and format vary by priest. Below is the Status Animarum for Matijas’ household.
Deskova vas, Slovenia
Now known as Mathias and Mary Stephanz, they lived their remaining lives in Kansas City, Kansas, raising two girls and two boys. Mary was Naturalized in 1895, and Mathias in 1900.
By the 1920s, he was a “Cabinet Maker” at a Cabinet Shop. He took his “Coach Maker” skills to work on furniture. This skill took him to Abernathy Brothers Furniture Store. In 1936, while working as a “furniture packer” with Abernathy, he received an injury that infected and caused Streptococcus in his left hand. It seems it went downhill from there with pneumonia and fluid in his lungs. I wonder if it had to do with Kansas City experiencing one of the worst heatwaves in North America in the same year, causing it not to heal.
He died at only 68 years of age. For an interesting twist to this family, read Hidden In A Letter.
Above is his death certificate. It also lists where he was buried, Mt. Calvary Catholic Cemetery.
Another interesting tidbit. Had I known about this family in 2012, I might now live in Slovenia! In researching Mathias’ father, I received a Google response:
Matija Štefanc, rojen 17. 2. 1845, nazadnje stanujoč Dolenji Radenci 10, pošta Stari trg ob Kolpi, umrl neznano kdaj, je nedvomno že pokojni, ni pa mogoče dobiti dokazila o njegovi smrti. Poziva se vse, ki kaj vedo o Matiji Štefancu, zlasti o tem, kdaj in kje je umrl, da to sporočijo Okrajnemu sodišču v Črnomlju, najkasneje v treh mesecih po objavi tega oklica, ker bo sodišče sicer po preteku tega roka, imenovanega razglasilo za mrtvega. Okrajno sodišče v Črnomlju dne 21. 5. 2012
Google translation is:
Matija Štefanc, born 17. 2. 1845, last residing Dolenji Radenci 10 mail Stari trg at Kolpa, died when the unknown is no doubt already late, but it is impossible to obtain proof of his death. It urges all to what they know about Matija Štefanc, in particular about when and where he died, to report this to the Local Court in Črnomelj within three months after the publication of the notice because the court after the expiry of this period, known as declared dead. The District Court in Črnomlju of 21. 5. 2012
This land was the property of our ancestor, Matija Stefanc. As the Republic of Slovenia built a road through this land and they could not reach the person or next of kin, they proceeded with an act through the court, which proclaimed him dead.
Through careful documentation and family research, we’ve pieced together Mat Stephanz’s story, connecting the threads of his roots to his life in Kansas City. The journey to uncover your family’s past is as much about the process as it is about the stories you discover along the way.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
When I watched an episode of Who Do You Think You Are? featuring actress Allison Janney, I was captivated by her journey tracing her ancestor Stephen Hopkins. Hopkins survived a shipwreck on the Sea Venture in 1609 and found himself stranded in Bermuda. The ship’s name, Sea Venture, nagged at me as I watched. It sounded so familiar, as though I had encountered it before. Sure enough, a dive into my family history revealed an incredible connection. Here is the story of my ancestry and the Sea Venture!
“Historic Voyage, Sea Venture and Consorts at Sea 1609,” a 1984 oil painting by Deryck Foster
The Fateful Voyage of the Sea Venture
The Sea Venture, also known as the Third Supply, was the flagship of a fleet carrying six hundred passengers—including men, women, and livestock—to the struggling colony at Jamestowne. On July 23, 1609, a hurricane separated the Sea Venture from the rest of the fleet. After four harrowing days, the ship began to take on water. Miraculously, it wrecked between two reefs on the island of Bermuda, allowing all 140 passengers to disembark safely.
Among the passengers was Stephen Hopkins, Allison Janney’s ancestor. The Hopkins family’s survival story was remarkable, but my personal connection to the Sea Venture lay elsewhere.
My Ancestors and Jamestowne
Tracing my lineage through my great-grandmother Wescott’s line brought me back to Jamestowne. For historical context:
“In June 1606, King James I granted a charter to the Virginia Company to establish an English settlement in North America. By May 14, 1607, settlers landed on Jamestown Island to establish a colony 60 miles from the Chesapeake Bay.” (Source)
This leads us to Alice, my 11th great-grandmother, whose last name remains unknown. Alice’s first husband was Thomas Pierce, both born in England around 1585. Together, they had a daughter named Elizabeth. To understand Alice’s story, it is crucial to delve into Thomas Pierce’s history.
Thomas Pierce: A Life of Service and Tragedy
Thomas Pierce arrived in Virginia aboard the Margaret, which set sail in September 1619. He held a distinguished position as the Sergeant at Arms for the first legislative assembly in Virginia, which convened on July 30, 1619.
Pierce established a plantation south of Martin’s Hundred along the James River. On March 22, 1622, tragedy struck during the Indian Massacre of 1622. This violent conflict arose from tensions between colonists and the Powhatan people, exacerbated by the colony’s relentless expansion for tobacco cultivation.
Thomas, his wife, child, two other men, and a French boy were reported killed at the plantation. Thomas appears to have been a relative of Lt. William Pierce of the Sea Venture (1609), who served under George Yeardley, Captain of the Governor’s Company of soldiers. Williams’ daughter, Jane Pierce, was the third wife of John Rolfe (who was also on the Sea Venture), the guy who married Pocahontas.
Survival Against the Odds
Despite the devastation, Alice and her daughter Elizabeth somehow survived. It is believed they were among 20 captives taken by the Powhatan and later ransomed after about ten months in captivity. Identified survivors included Mrs. Boyce and Jane Dickenson, both widows of men killed at Martin’s Hundred.
The Bennett Connection
Alice later remarried Richard Bennett Sr. of Isle of Wight, VA, my 10th great-grandfather. It’s important to note that this Richard Bennett is often confused with another man of the same name, a governor of Virginia from 1652-55. The two Richards, while contemporaries, are from different lineages.
The internet is rife with misinformation about the Bennetts, often conflating the two families. However, careful research through sources like Virginia Immigrants and Adventurers: A Biographical Dictionary, 1607-1635 by Martha W. McCartney has helped clarify the facts.
The following is transcribed from Colonial Records of Virginia, R.F. Walker.
At Mr. Thomas Pierce’s House over against Mulberry Island. Master Tho: Pierce, his Wife, his Childe, John Hopkins, (could he be related to Ms. Janney’s Stephen?) John Samon, A French Boy.
Named by the first colonists for its dense population of wild mulberry trees, Mulberry Islandshows up in some of the earliest maps of Virginia, as well as the writings of Capt. John Smith.
Courtesy National Park Service, Colonial National Historical Park
The following is a paragraph wildly spread on the internet but has been proven false by many history sites such as Chauco (Chanco) Virginia Indian.
Southside Virginia Families, Vol. I by John Bennett Boddie
In fact, it is more realistic to believe what is written on Historynet’s website:
These female colonists, perhaps 20 in all, were virtually the only captives taken by the Powhatans in the uprising. Few details of their ordeal have survived, and information about their lives is almost nonexistent. In fact, we may never know if they shared the fascinating, if often horrifying, adventures of more well-known Indian captives in American history. It is certain, however, that these women witnessed the violent deaths of neighbors and loved ones before being abducted; that they lived with their enemies while the English ruthlessly attacked Indian villages in retaliation; and that they received no heroes’ welcome upon their return to the colony.
The Richard Bennett above is not my Richard. Thomas Bennett is mine and the father of my Richard Bennett (not listed), the son of Alice and Thomas and half-brother to Elizabeth.
Records were destroyed in the Civil War, so nothing more is known about Thomas except what was found in the will of Anthony Barham, who was one of Elizabeth’s husbands. Because of this will, we can trace his descendants.
Richard Bennett, Jr., my 9th great-grandfather, was born June 1, 1644, in Isle of Wight, Virginia. He married Ann, last name unknown, and they had five children. Again, you can read about all five in the above link.
Will of Richard Bennett Jr. made on March 3, 1720
Isle Of Wight County, Virginia March ye 3rd Day 1720 In the Name of God Amen. Rich’d Bennett in ye upper parish of Isle of Wight County in Virginia being sick & weak in body yet in perfect memory thanks be to God for it Do therefore do make this my Last Will & Testament as followith-first I Commit my soul to God our Heavenly Father trusting to be saved by Jesus Christ our only Saviour and my body on Earth to be Decently Buried & as for my worldly Goods I bestow as followith I Give and bequeath unto my son Richd Bennett to him & his heirs lawfully begotten of his body two hundred acres of Land & over it being Land where on my Son Richard now lives I give & bequeath unto my son James with ye other two hundred acres of Land where on he now lives. I lay to him & to his heirs lawfully begotton of his Body forever it is a Coveyance of four hundred acres of Land I bought of Mr John Coffers pattin of Land being fourteen hundred & fifty acres 1 Give & bequeath unto Jane Coffer & her two sons Rob Coffer & John Coffer to them & their heirs Lawfully of their body for ever my plantation and land whereon I now live I lay to them & to their heirs for ever it being part of Land Which was bought formerly of Mr Wm Miles I Give and bequeath unto Jane Coffer a small trunk & a Gold Ring and a Great Iron pot I Give & bequeath to Rich Coffer my Long Gun I Give & bequeath to Magdalen Coffer one Great pewter Dish and one Great Basin I Give and bequeath to Francis Manggum my Gran Daughter a feather Bed & all ye belongs to it 2 I Give and bequeath unto my Daughter Silvester a Couple of Dishes & a Couple of plates furthermore I do appoint Jane Coffer & Wm Allen to be my full and whole Exct to pay my Debts & to Receive what is owing to me & when these my Debts being paid ye rest of my Goods within Doores and outDoores to be Equally Divided amongst my Children Desiring this my trusty friends Jno & James Carter to See this my Last Will & testament fulfilled In Witness here of I sett my hand & Seal Rich’d R Bennett (Seal)
Richard Jr.’s daughter, Ann Bennett, married John Cofer circa 1699, my 8th great-grandparent. You can continue this line by reading my previous blog post, The Cofer Legacy: A Journey Through Generations.
Inside the fort at Jamestown, in the cellar seen just below the back wall of a stone foundation, archaeologists found a pendant that dates to the Virginia colony’s earliest years. A seventeenth-century church tower and the 1907 tercentenary obelisk are also seen. ~website at history.org
Reflecting on Family History
Discovering my connection to the Sea Venture and Jamestowne has been an exhilarating journey. It’s incredible to imagine the resilience of my ancestors, from surviving shipwrecks to enduring captivity, and their role in the early days of America. Their stories are not just tales of survival but of strength and determination, echoing across generations to inspire us today.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
You must be logged in to post a comment.