Category: Historical Societies

Soldiers of the Surf: Celebrating 150 Years of the U.S. Life-Saving Service

October commemorated the 150th anniversary of the United States Life-Saving Service, the predecessor of today’s US Coast Guard, along the East Coast!

The United States Coast Guard is recognized for numerous achievements, with its primary focus in the public’s eye being its mission to assist those “in peril upon the seas.” In fact, every federal agency that contributed to the establishment of the modern Coast Guard played a role in aiding those in distress and working to prevent loss of life at sea.

For instance, the U.S. Lighthouse Service was responsible for maintaining lighthouses and navigational markers to alert ships to potential dangers. Lighthouse Keepers also provided assistance to individuals in peril near their stations. Additionally, there were other agencies, such as the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service, which aided mariners in distress at sea, and the Steamboat Inspection Service, tasked with preventing disasters before they occurred. Among these organizations, the one that significantly shaped the U.S. Coast Guard’s reputation as a lifesaving entity was the U.S. Life-Saving Service. It is essential to explore the history of this Service, as many of the U.S. Coast Guard’s search and rescue practices can be traced back to its foundational work.

During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, much of the eastern coastline of the United States was sparsely populated. Crews of ships that ran aground could anticipate minimal, if any, assistance. As maritime trade expanded, so did the need for support for vessels wrecked near the shore. Both coasts featured sandbars located 300 to 800 yards offshore. In the event of a storm, ships stranded on these sandbars often broke apart within hours. Very few individuals could endure a 300-yard swim through tumultuous surf with a temperature of 40 degrees.

In 1848, the federal government initiated its involvement in shore-based lifesaving operations. The U.S. Revenue Marine, which later became known as the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service, was tasked with overseeing these stations under the Treasury Department. The Great Carolina Hurricane struck the East Coast in 1854 as a category 4, resulting in numerous sailor fatalities due to a lack of lifesaving stations and poorly maintained equipment, which was sometimes used inappropriately, such as using a lifeboat for mixing mortar or scalding hogs. In response, Congress allocated funds for additional stations, and this time, part of the budget was dedicated to hiring full-time keepers for each facility.

Here is a clipping found in The Charleston Mercury, Charleston, South Carolina describing the storm • Sat, Sep 9, 1854, Page 2 https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-charleston-mercury-great-carolina-hu/103886025

The American Civil War led to the neglect of the government’s lifesaving network along the coast, a situation that persisted until 1870 when another devastating storm caused significant loss of life. In 1871, Mr. Sumner Kimball successfully secured a $200,000 appropriation from Congress, which authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to employ crews of surfmen as needed. Kimball established six-man crews at all stations, constructed new facilities, developed regulations with performance standards for crew members, established station routines and physical requirements, thereby laying the foundation for a more professional organization.

By 1874, the lifesaving stations expanded to cover the Maine coast and ten sites south of Cape Henry, Virginia, including the Outer Banks of North Carolina. The following year saw further expansion to the Delaware-Maryland-Virginia Peninsula, the Great Lakes, and the Florida coast. Eventually, the Gulf and West Coasts were incorporated, along with a station in Nome, Alaska. Four years later, the lifesaving stations were formalized as a distinct agency within the Treasury Department, named the U.S. Life-Saving Service, with Sumner I. Kimball appointed as General Superintendent. The stations were categorized into three main types: lifesaving stations, lifeboat stations, and houses of refuge. Lifesaving stations employed full-time crews during periods with a high likelihood of shipwrecks, typically from November to April, known as the “active season.”

On March 26, 1887, John T. Wescott, my 2nd great-grandfather, was appointed Keeper of Poyners Hill Station, built in 1878. Poyners Hill was 6 miles south of Currituck Beach Lighthouse on the northern Outer Banks.

By the early 1900s, these operations expanded to year-round activity. Many stations were situated in remote areas, requiring crew members to proficiently launch boats from the beach into the surf. The third category, houses of refuge, were located along the coasts of South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, housing a paid keeper and a small boat, though they did not maintain active rescue operations. Life-Saving District Superintendents reported directly to Kimball, while an Inspector of Life Saving Stations, a Captain in the U.S. Revenue Marine Service, also reported to him. This structure created a system of checks and balances.

The Superintendents were accountable for selecting keepers, who in turn chose their crews. Both keepers and crews underwent evaluations by an inspection board comprised of a Revenue Marine officer, a surgeon from the Marine Hospital Service (later known as the U.S. Public Health Service), and a skilled surfman to assess their health, character, and abilities. Keepers were expected to be physically fit, of good moral standing, literate, under forty-five years of age, and adept at boat handling, particularly in challenging weather. Many keepers had extensive backgrounds in fishing or maritime professions, or they advanced through the ranks of the U.S. Life-Saving Service. While some keepers moved from station to station, many remained at a single station or within close proximity throughout their careers.

The daring rescues undertaken by the U.S. Life-Saving Service captivated the imagination of 19th-century America. The image of a keeper standing tall at the stern of a small boat, gripping his sweep oar and motivating his crew through the towering surf, inspired reporters to craft thrilling stories. Phrases like “soldiers of the surf” and “storm warriors” became popular descriptors for these brave lifesavers. While their rescues were indeed remarkable, the majority of the crews’ efforts focused on rigorous training with rescue equipment, conducting patrols, maintaining lookout duties, and ensuring the general upkeep of their stations. 

The men worked from Monday through Saturday, honing their skills with beach apparatus. When district inspectors arrived, the entire drill had to be completed in five minutes; any delays could lead to dismissal. Crews practiced launching and landing their boats through the surf, and to prepare for emergencies, they would intentionally capsize their boats and practice righting them. Training also included signaling, first aid, and maintaining the cleanliness of the station. Although the drills were simple in nature, they were continuously reinforced, ensuring that the crew could respond swiftly and instinctively in critical situations. Additionally, they had another crucial responsibility that occupied a significant part of the surfmen’s daily routine: lookout and patrol duties. During daylight hours, a surfman was designated to monitor the surrounding waters from the lookout tower. To ensure vigilance, no seating was provided in the tower.

The beaches were often “cloaked in ice,” and at their best, resembled “pathless deserts in the night.” The treacherous combination of “soft sand, disorienting snowfalls, fierce winds, and biting cold” frequently threatened to halt the men. Surfmen dressed in oilskins and carried a patrol clock to avoid overlapping with other patrols, along with a pouch of coston signals (the pouch was created by my 2nd great-grandfather Captain John Thomas Wescott, Jr.) These signals functioned like flares, alerting ships that were coming too close to the shore or informing grounded vessels that they had been spotted and assistance was on the way. Mariners were fortunate that beach patrols operated in all kinds of weather. In 1899, for instance, surfmen using coston signals successfully warned off 143 ships at risk of running aground. Notably, in October of that same year, Surfman Rasmus Midgett (my 1st cousin 4x removed) of the Gull Shoals, North Carolina Station, achieved the remarkable feat of rescuing ten individuals from the wreck of the Priscilla while on patrol—all by himself.1

The Life-Saving Service saw its most significant expansion between 1871 and 1881, during which it executed some of its most notable rescues. However, as the nineteenth century approached its end, the Service faced two critical challenges. Firstly, the rise of steam-powered vessels reduced the reliance on sailing ships, making them less susceptible to the whims of the wind and decreasing the likelihood of shipwrecks. Secondly, the Service struggled to adapt to the growing number of gasoline-powered small boats, particularly those used for leisure activities.

Additional issues emerged, including the absence of a retirement system and a lack of compensation for injured crew members. Low salaries made it difficult to recruit new personnel, and without retirement benefits, promotions proved challenging. By 1914, some keepers were in their seventies, manning the traditional sweep oar, while the stroke positions were filled by men in their sixties. Kimball had long sought a retirement system for his staff. In 1914, he concluded that merging the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service with the U.S. Life-Saving Service would benefit both organizations and the nation. Consequently, the legislation establishing the U.S. Coast Guard was enacted on January 28, 1915, which included provisions for retirement for Kimball and many of the senior keepers and surfmen.

My 2nd great-grandfather’s retirement letter.

The U.S. Life-Saving Service exhibited remarkable dedication throughout its forty-four years of operation. During this time, “28,121 vessels and 178,741 individuals benefited from its services.” Remarkably, only “1,455 people lost their lives while under the protection of the Life-Saving Service.” Even as late as 1959, U.S. Coast Guard Lifeboat Stations on the Great Lakes were utilizing a revised version of the Life-Saving Service’s drill schedule. Weekly beach apparatus drills continued to be conducted for first aid and signaling practice. Additionally, lookout tower watches were still operational. The ongoing emphasis on practicing with rescue equipment and conducting inspections persists to this day.

The wooden Monomoy pulling surfboat Salisbury Beach LSS, Cape Cod, MA-
Photo By: U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office

The United States Coast Guard has built upon the solid foundation laid by the U.S. Life-Saving Service and has incorporated its own initiatives, evolving into the recognized authority in maritime search and rescue operations. The introduction of the 36 and 44-foot motor lifeboats, the creation of a dedicated search and rescue school, and the utilization of helicopters have all enhanced the Coast Guard’s stature as the premier agency for those “in peril upon the seas.” Today, the men and women of the U.S. Coast Guard uphold the service legacy established by the U.S. Life-Saving Service crews, and with their advanced equipment, they have surpassed the achievements of their esteemed predecessors.

Massachusetts – Salisbury Beach USLSS Crew, surfboat & cart, no date.
Photo By: U.S. Coast Guard Historian’s Office

As we reflect on the legacy of the U.S. Life-Saving Service, we honor the brave men, known as the ‘soldiers of the surf,’ whose dedication and sacrifice laid the groundwork for today’s U.S. Coast Guard. Their timeless commitment to rescuing those ‘in peril upon the seas’ continues to inspire the men and women of the modern Coast Guard, who uphold this noble tradition. As we commemorate 150 years, let us remember their courage, their innovation, and the lives they saved along the treacherous coasts of America.

Noble, D. L. (1 Jan 1976). A Legacy: The United States Life-Saving Service. U.S. Coast Guard. https://uslife-savingservice.org/about-us/history-of-the-uslss/

  1. https://www.mycg.uscg.mil/News/Article/3370103/the-long-blue-line-evidence-suggests-the-midgetts-actually-were-mighty/ ↩︎

From Krefeld to Nicetown: The Legacy of Hans de Neus and Philadelphia’s Early Settlers

Some sources show that Hans de Neus was born in France in about 1670 and was a French Huguenot fleeing prosecution.   However, the more research I do, the more I see that he seems to have been born in Germany.   

His parents were Olletgen te Neuss and Nelis Wienands, both from Germany.

Hans founded the Nice family in Philadelphia, specifically in Nicetown, consisting of 725 acres. He is believed to have gone to Holland to seek refuge from religious (Mennonite) persecution. In Holland, he met and married his wife, Janneke Bloemen. It is said that they celebrated the construction of their house by breaking a bottle of schnapps over it, christening both the house and their plantation as Nicetown.

Wikipedia states “This original early 18th century structure burned in 1800. Hans and his brother Jan had emigrated from Amsterdam in 1698; Jan settled in Germantown. Both were Mennonite ministers and could read and write. Hans and his descendants were well known as zimmermen (builders of houses). One descendant was a member of the Carpenter’s Society of Philadelphia in the early 1800s. Another was Captain John Nice of Germantown, who led the charge at the Battle of Germantown during the Revolutionary War. Other authors provide varied suggestions for the origin of Nicetown. Finkel says that it was “[n]amed for de Neus, Dutch Huguenots who settled there about 1700”.[3] Other spellings seen for the same surname are Neiss, Neisse, and, of course, the Nice seen in the placename Nicetown. There are 19th-century headstones in nearby Germantown marked with the surname Nice.”

The “te Neues” family had lived near Krefeld, Germany, at Lürrip since at least 1296.1

In his 1911 book Colonial Families of Philadelphia, John W. Jordan stated that Hans was born in Crefeld, but he did not provide the source for this information. (Krefeld, also known as Crefeld until 1929, is a city in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany). According to Mt. Airy scholar J.M. Duffin, the Krefelders were German-speaking and originally Dutch-speaking Germans who were Quakers. Krefeld is located on the border of the Netherlands and Germany, so it is understandable that they would be fluent in both languages.

Krefeld

Chronicle – the emigration

Krefeld · The Mennonites have their origins in the Anabaptist movement, which arose in Zurich around 1525. The movement spread to the Netherlands, where in 1536 Menno Simons took up the ideas of the Anabaptist movement and formed a consciously pacifist community with the moderate part, called “Mennonites”.

  • 2Krefeld became a place of refuge for Mennonites who were persecuted in many places and for the religious community of Quakers who later joined them. But here too there were tensions with the long-established population. It just so happened that at that time the governor of Pennsylvania, William Penn, wanted to recruit settlers for his country. They should be God-fearing people who, like Penn, should also be Quakers. The German lawyer Franz Daniel Pastorius arrived, founded “Germantown” and acquired the 13 families. 328 years ago the Krefeld residents, Mennonites and Quakers, sailed from Holland to America . On July 24, 1683 the English sailing ship “Concord” set sail from the Dutch port of Gavesend. On October 6, 1683 they reached Philadelphia

Mennonites are a branch of the Christian church, with roots in the radical wing of the 16th century Protestant Reformation. Part of the group known as Anabaptists (because they rebaptized adult believers), the Mennonites took their name from Menno Simons, a Dutch Catholic priest who converted to the Anabaptist faith and helped lead it to prominence in Holland by the mid-16th century. 3

It is now known that the Nice family is one of the families in The Ancestry of the Thirteen Krefeld Emigrants of 1683, as mentioned in the 1956 article of the Franconia Mennonite Conference. The origins of the Franconia Conference are connected with the settlement of the Mennonites at Germantown near Philadelphia in 1683. The early Mennonite settlers of Germantown represented four distinct groups: (1) those from Krefeld who arrived in 1683 ff. and bore such names as Lensen, Op den Graeff, van Bebber, Telner, Umstat, Jansen, Neuss, Tyson, Sellen, and Hosters, William Rittenhouse, first Mennonite minister in America, H. Kasselberg, and Jacob Godshalk, the first American Mennonite bishop.

William Rittenhouse in the above article is my 8th great-grandfather.

In other sources I’ve read, Jacob Godshalk’s father served the Neuss family.

From the book Pennsylvania German Roots Across the Ocean,

Neuss_Pennsylvania German Roots Across the Ocean

His wife, Jenneken “Jane” Blomen, was born in Holland around 1670. Further research is needed on her family.

Hans’ brother, Jan, married Elisabeth Lucken, who was the sister of one of the 13 founders of Germantown in Philadelphia. Both brothers and their wives traveled to Philadelphia to seek religious freedom in William Penn’s colony, which was specifically established for that purpose.  Below is written in Appendix C of William Penn and the Dutch Quaker Migration to Pennsylvania:

Neuss Wm Penn and the Quaker Migration

Evidently, Hans was naturalized as “Nous” in 1709, but the name did not stick.

In the following PDF link is accounts information and a black and white photo of a Silver Porringer made by Jan de Neuss.  A Philadelphia Silver Porringer4

It is interesting to note the relationship of this family long ago with William Penn’s secretary, James Logan, especially considering that my grandmother Kunkle, whose family is the Neuss’, married a Logan.

Here is an excerpt from the diary of one of our Revolutionary War cousins, which is housed at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. It even includes his resignation letter to General George Washington!   The Diary of Captain John Nice, of the Pennsylvania Line5

“The Early History of the Germantown Congregation,” Germantown Meeting House History states, “…in 1690, the Germantown Mennonites chose William Rittenhouse as their minister, and Jan Neuss their deacon. For unknown reasons, Rittenhouse felt unable to supervise communication, so in 1702, Jacob Gottschalk and Hans Neuss were ordained ministers to assist him.”6

The last name is now spelled Neis in my branch.  Bertolet’s Mennonite Church Cemetery was once Zachariah Neis’ farm.  His daughter, Susanna Neis, married Michael Schlonecker, Jr., whose family came from Germany.  They had Esther Slonaker, who married Conrad Hawk,  who had Esther “Hettie” Hawk, who married Michael Kunkle, who had Charles, who had Hilda, my grandmother!

The story of Hans de Neus is a testament to the resilience and determination of those who sought a new life in America. From the bustling town of Krefeld to the quiet fields of Nicetown, Hans and his descendants played a significant role in shaping the early history of Philadelphia. Their journey is more than a tale of migration; it’s a narrative of faith, perseverance, and community-building. As we reflect on their legacy, we are reminded of the rich tapestry of cultures and histories that form the foundation of our nation, with the Neis family standing as a proud thread woven into that fabric.

Image created by OpenAI’s DALL-E, August 2024.

  1. Hassan, Hazel Deter. The Nice Family History: Descendants of Henry Clemmer Nice, 1822-1892. 1965. ↩︎
  2. “Krefeld: Chronicle: the Emigration.” Rheinische Post, 23 Mar. 2011, rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/krefeld/chronik-die-auswanderung_aid-13560923. Accessed 18 Aug. 2024. ↩︎
  3. “Who Are The Mennonites.” Mennonite Church USA, 2020, http://www.mennoniteusa.org/who-are-mennonites/history/. Accessed 18 Aug. 2024. ↩︎
  4. “170 A Philadelphia Silver Porringer The Historical Society of Pennsylvania.” The Pennsylvania State University, 1931, journals.psu.edu/pmhb/article/download/28223/27979. Accessed 18 Aug. 2024. ↩︎
  5. Nice, J., & Burd, E. (1893). Extracts from the Diary of Captain John Nice, of the Pennsylvania Line. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 16(4), 399-411. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20083504 ↩︎
  6. “The Historic 1770 Germantown Mennonite Meetinghouse.” Germantown Mennonite Historic Trust, http://www.meetinghouse.info/early-history-of-the-germantown-congregation.html. Accessed 18 Aug. 2024. ↩︎

Logan of Restalrig: Theories on Our Scotch-Irish Heritage

Featured Image above created by ChatGPT- Not actual Logan shield or colors.

Below are the actual Clan Logan crest and tartan.

https://www.clanlogansociety.org/
https://www.clanlogansociety.org/
https://www.clanlogansociety.org/
Marker stone for the burial place of Robert the Bruce’s heart, Melrose Abbey

At my sister’s request, I am writing about some theories on where John Loggan, our American immigrant, might have come from.  We know from records that he “was descended from a long line of Scotch barons deriving their name, Celtic in origin, from the ancestral home, Logan, in Ayrshire.1”  We also know from these same records that he was Scotch Presbyterian.

In January 2013, a gentleman emailed me and told me of a website called “clanlogansociety.com” now Clan Logan Society International, and “electricscotland.com,” of which he was Vice President.  His name is James C. Logan.  At the time, we had no idea if we were related, but he gave me some information on some interesting Logans.  Since then, we have found that we share the same 3rd great-grandfather, Lemuel H. Logan.  James has done an extensive search on this line using records as well as DNA.  There is a DNA Pre-1900Logans Project that uses numbers to distinguish families.  Ours is Limb 1, #1034.

DNA links John Logan #1034 directly to the Gawn Logan family #1032, which suggests our Logan line immigrated from Scotland to Ireland where they lived perhaps several generations before moving on to Connecticut.

They are no doubt closely related. With the differences in age, it could well be that Gawn is actually descended from John, and the connection has not yet been identified. Alternatively, Gawn may descend from a brother or some other near relative of John.

John arrived in the Colony of Connecticut in about 1729 or so with enough wealth to purchase a farm. James thinks the funds came from his inheritance or possibly a sale of a land grant in the Ulster Plantation. DNA indicates that we are related to some Logans from Ayrshire, Scotland. He found a Walter Logane who left Ayrshire about 1610 for the Ulster Plantation and obtained a land grant in 1617. He thinks Walter may be John’s great-grandfather.

“Sir Hugh Montgomery, 2nd Viscount Ards, received his land grant from King James I of England (James IV of Scotland) on the condition that he settle English and Scottish Protestants on their estates. Sir Hugh returned to Braidstane [in Ayrshire] during the winter of 1605/06 with the purpose of inducing his neighbors to join him. The surnames of the Scots who took letters of denization in 1617 include Catherwood, Boyle, Harper, Barkley, Moore, Hunter, Thompson, Logan, Crawford, Agnew, Adair, Wilson, Williamson, Cunningham, Cathart, Maxwell, Allen, Fraser, Aiken, McDowell, Harvy, Semple, Anderson, Kennedy, Martin, Speir and Montgomery.2“

“All the substantial persons – Persons of this class generally took out letters of denization soon after they came to Ireland. The following received such letters of denization in 1617, the majority of them having settled on Sir Hugh Montgomery’s estates, probably ten years prior to that date. Viz.” John Wyly of Ballyhay………………… Walter Logane of Proveston……………..Alexander Speire of Gray Abbey. – fm. Calendar of Pat. Rolls, James I, pp. 3263393. ” (Interesting to note is that the name Wyly is one of the families with whom John came to Connecticut with.)

So, yes, indeed, we are related to the Scottish Logans — and most probably to the Logan of Restalrig, as some of this family moved to Ayrshire after the last Baron of Restalrig (the 7th Baron) was deprived of his title and land holdings by a huge miscarriage of justice which can be read about here.

Click the book above to read more about the Logans of Restalrig.

“During the reign of Robert the Bruce, the barony of Restalrig, on which the town of Leith is built, passed by marriage into possession of the Logans, and soon afterwards occurred the most heroic episode which stands to their name. Sir Robert and Sir Walter Logan were two of the knights who accompanied the Good Sir James of Douglas in his expedition to bury the heart of King Robert the Bruce in the Holy Sepulcher. On the plain of Granada, when the little body of Scottish knights found itself hemmed round by Moorish spears, and Douglas, throwing his master’s heart far into the press, rode after it and fell, Sir Walter and Sir Robert fell with him.4“

You can read all of their researched articles on Restalrig or the  History of the Logans

Another interesting read is The Logans of Restalrig-Scot Clans

Logan_by_R_R_McIan
“Logan”. A Victorian-era, romanticized depiction of a member of the clan by R. R. McIan, from The Clans of the Scottish Highlands, published in 1845.

Again, genealogy is documenting records from person to person.  There is a huge gap of missing sources from our John Loggan b. 1699 to the 7th Baron of Restalrig, Sir Robert Logan b. 1555, but there are a lot of remarkable concurrences of events happening here to suggest we are on the right track.

  1. A National Register of the Society, Sons of the American Revolution, Volume 1 By Sons of the American Revolution, Louis Henry Cornish, Alonzo Howard Clark ↩︎
  2. Jonathan Bardon, The Plantation of Ulster, Gill Books, Dublin, 2012, ISBN 978 07171 5447 0, pp. 77. Perceval-Maxwell, M., The Scottish Migration to Ulster in the Reign of James I., Belfast, 1973, pp. 57. ↩︎
  3. Sir Hugh Montgomery, The Montgomery Manuscripts, (1603-1706), Archer & Sons, Belfast, 1869 (from the library of the University of Toronto), pp 5, 94, 117, 322. ↩︎
  4. https://electricscotland.com/webclans/htol/logan2.html ↩︎

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Pennsylvania: A Gateway to America’s Heritage and Industry

For most of us, Pennsylvania played an important role in our ancestors’ history. Pennsylvania has been a destination for a wide range of immigrants, including Europeans, African Americans, and others. These individuals were drawn to the state because of its significant role in the nation’s development and its diverse industries. During the colonial period, Pennsylvania’s religious freedom attracted various ethnic and religious groups, such as Quakers, Mennonites, and Amish. Welsh Quakers settled in what are now Montgomery, Chester, and Delaware counties, while German immigrants developed their own dialect and eventually became known as the Pennsylvania Dutch.

Pennsylvania experienced substantial industrial growth, particularly in steel production, coal mining, and oil fields. This led to a large influx of European immigrants seeking employment, including individuals from Ireland, Germany, Italy, Poland, Scandinavia, Russia, and Slovakia. Moreover, the state played a pivotal role in the Civil War and served as a primary entry point for many immigrants.

The Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission was created in 1945 and is responsible for the collection, conservation, and interpretation of Pennsylvania’s historic heritage. Not only do they oversee the state archives, which you can visit in person or online, but they also have a wonderful museum section. These museums encompass Daniel Boone (he was born in Pennsylvania), the lumber industry, the mining industry, the railroads, and many others. They even have a “village & farming” museum. You can visit these in person or online as well.

In addition, check out PA History 2 G0, a series of videos produced by the PHMC, with funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services. These short videos introduce you to Pennsylvania’s state-owned historic sites and museums as they explore the varied stories that make up the commonwealth’s rich history. Still, they have an online collection of historical objects, archaeological artifacts, and natural history specimens.

Pennsylvania’s rich history is deeply intertwined with the stories of our ancestors, who found in this state a place of opportunity, freedom, and growth. From the religious sanctuaries of the colonial era to the booming industries that shaped the nation, Pennsylvania has been a beacon for diverse communities and a witness to pivotal moments in American history. As we explore the state’s historic sites, museums, and archives, whether in person or online, we not only honor our heritage but also gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and triumphs that have shaped the lives of those who came before us. The Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission continues to preserve and share these stories, ensuring that the legacy of our ancestors remains alive for generations to come.

Image Depicting Pennsylvania’s Rich History and Industrial Heritage. OpenAI, 2024.

Uncovering the Story of Susanna Clark Rootes, My 9th Great Grandmother: A Tale of Witches and New England Founders

📸Microsoft Designer AI

So, witches run in my family.  Why doesn’t that surprise me?

Susanna (née Clark) was the wife of Josiah Rootes (1613-1683). Josiah Rootes, originally from Great Chart, Kent, England, was a passenger on the Hercules of Sandwich, under the command of Captain John Witherley. The ship was bound for “the plantation called New England in America” in the spring of 1634/5. Josiah, along with his mother and brother, migrated to America and was instrumental in founding the Beverly Church.

Josiah had taken the oath of allegiance and supremacy at Great Chart and received his certificate from Robert Gorsham, curator of Great Chart, on 20 March 1634/35. The Hercules of Sandwich is probably the same as the Hercules of Dover mentioned by Winthrop as being here in the summer. ~~Samuel G. Drake, Result of Some Researches Among the British Archives for Information Relative to the Founders of New England: Made in the Years 1858, 1859 and 1860 (n.p.: H.W. Dutton and Son, Printers, Transcript Office, 1860; reprint Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1963), 84.

On June 25, 1678, Josiah made a sworn accusation of thievery against William and Elizabeth Hoar. He claimed the family had stolen (clothing, apples, wood, and hay) from him for nearly twenty years, and he had only just discovered proof – in the form of Goody Hoar’s apron.  

When several neighbors came under suspicion of receiving stolen goods from Mr. Hale’s maid, Margaret Lord, Josiah Rootes complained to the court in a written statement that “for neare twenty years together we haue ben Aflicted by hauing owr goods stollen At sundri time And we not Abell To make due profe haue ben forsed To sufer owr seuellfes To be wrownged in estat And name: And god by his prouidens hauing latlie discouered sum of Theas wokes of darknes wee Judg yt. To be owre duty To speake in vindicasion of Truth and Conuictccion of sine…. He deposed in Salem Court that same month, aged about 65, and again, aged about 60, as did his wife “Susanah Roots, aged about forty-eight years…”

Their son, Jonathan Rootes, aged about thirteen years, affirmed…” Among those who testified were Abigell Stone, Jr., Abigall Ston, Jr., John Lovet, Jr., and Bethiah Lovet (Sussanah’s daughter).”

That same day, Susanna first appears on record: Susanah Roots, aged about fifty-three years, Mary, wife of Heugh Woodbery, aged about forty-eight years, and Sarah Roots, aged about twenty-four years, deposed that about two months ago they saw Mary, wife of Samuell Harres and Tabitha Slew carry a parcel of small linen into Samuell Harris’ house.

Five years later, in the spring of 1683, Josiah Rootes passed away. He named Susanna as the executrix of his will and stipulated, “…my loveing wife Susanna [have] the use & improvement of all my small estate, what ever untill such time, as my son Jonathan cometh to the age…” and if she did not remarry, “[Jonathan] shall pay unto her, his said mother eight pounds, [yearly] duerring the terme of her widdowhood, or her natural life, and let her have the use of the west end of my now dwellinghouse, of a bed, beding, her firewood brought to the doare [door].”

For the period, this is an appropriate provision for a wife who worked land, maintained a household, bore and nurtured six children. Josiah’s specification that Susanna have the sunny west-facing room with cozy bed and fire burning is lovely and fitting after 40 years of toil at his side. –Poor Irish & Pilgrims. New World Shoots from Old World Roots. 

Inventory of the estate of Josiah Roots of Beverly, who deceased June 3, 1683, taken by Samuel Corning, sr., and Andrew Elliott: one coverlaide, lOs.; 1 bed ticking, iSs.; coverlaide, ili.; 4 yards of red Cloth at 6s. per yard, 21i. 4s.; 7 yards of Lining Cloth, ili. 8s.; 4 yards of Dowless, 8s.; 4 yards and 1-2 of kerzey, ili. 6d.; New England money, 71i. 8s.; old England money, 16s., 81i. 4s.; 2 yards of broad Cloth, ili. 2s.; 1 yard & 1-2 of broad Cloth, 18s.; 2 yards and 1 quarter of Red Cloth, 155.; 1 Carpet, lOs.; 11 yards of sarge, 21i. 4s.; 7 yards of white Cotten, 14s.; 1 Chest, 2s. and his woolling wearing Cloths, 51i. 5s.; and his wearing Linning, ili. lOs.; 61i. 17s.; 6 yards of kerzey, ili. 16s.; 4 yards and a quarter of kerzie, 31i. is. 6d.; 3 yards of Lining Cloth, 55. & 1 hatt, 45. 9s.; 8 pair of sheets for beding, 41i.; bed and its belongings, 41i. lOs.; 1 bed and 2 bed steads with other furniture, 5 li.; 1 bed with its furniture, 21i. lOs., and other Lumber, 31i.; 3 chests, ili. 2s.; 1 Table and 3 Joint stooles, 1 Table, 18s.; Cushions, 6s.; 1 Little Table, 4s. 21i. lOs.; 2 Chairs, 3s.; pewter, 21i.; brass & Iron, ili. 13s., 31i. 13s.; I Cart & wheels, plowghs & plowgh tackell, 41i.; 1 sled & 4 axes, 6s.; 3 hoes, 3s. 9s.; barrell, Tubs and other Lumber, 12s.; 3 other Tubs, 2s. & 2 spades, 55. 7s.; 1 horse, 2li. lOs.; parcel of shingles, ili. 55., 31i. 155.; 10 thousand of shingle nailes, ili. 105.; 2 oxen, 71i. & 4 Cows at 121i., 19 Ii., 2 Steeres, 41i. los.; 19 Sheep & Lambs at 3 Ii. 19s., 81i. 9s.; houses, land and orchard, 2601i.; 6 Acres of meadow, 301i.; 5 swine, lOs. per, 21i. lOs.; total, 3841i. 19s. Several debts, 191i. 8s. 3d.

In his will dated 15 May 1683, Josiah Rootes, “of the town of Beverly,” leaves his entire estate to his son Jonathan, after settling legacies for his other children, Bethiah, John, and Thomas. He entrusts the management of his estate to his wife Susanna, whom he appoints as executrix until Jonathan reaches adulthood. After Jonathan comes of age, he is responsible for his mother’s support as long as she remains unmarried.~~ George Francis Dow, Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County, IX: 66. 67.

On June 26, 1683, Susanna Roots, now a widow, renounced her role as the executor of her husband’s will in a Salem court. She stated that she had “many weaknesses and infirmities of old age” and, therefore, could not serve as executor.

The court appointed John Hill and Nehemiah Grover to bring in an inventory as soon as possible, and the inventory was sworn to on 6 July 1683. (Andrew Elliot, who would, in 1692, accuse Susanna Rootes of witchcraft, was one of the appraisers).~~ George Francis Dow, Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County, VIII: 66, 6

Nine years later, as she approached her 70th year, she found herself being taken to Boston and thrown into jail with irons on a charge of witchcraft, which carried a sentence of death.

Accusing neighbors of theft in a close-knit community is a serious matter. It’s possible that friends of William and Mary Hoars, Mary Harres, and Tabitha Slew held a grudge against the Rootes family, or they might have been jealous of the Rootes’ wealth, leading to the accusations.

                         (Warrant for Arrest of Susannah Roots )

Salem May 21-1692

To the Constables of Beverly.

Whereas Complaint hath been this day made before us, by Sergent Thomas Puttnam and John Puttnam: both of Salem village yeomen against Susannah Roots of Beverly widdow for sundry acts of witchcrafft by her Commited on the bodys of Mary wallcott Abigal williams Marcy Lewis Ann Puttnam and others.

You are therfore in their Majesties names hereby Required to apprehend and forthwith bring before us Susannah Roots of Beverly widdow, who stands charged with Committing Sundry acts of witchcraft as aboves’d to the wrong and Injury of the bodys of the above-named Persons, in order to her Examination Relateing to the aboves’d Premises faile not Dated Salem May the 21’st 1692

John Hathorne

Jonathan. Corwin

[Pbar ]r order of the Govener & Councell

To the Marshall of Essex or his Deputy vera Copia attest

May 21 — 1692

*Geor: Herrick Marshall of Essex

I doe apoint mr Jonathan Biles to bee my Lawffull Deputy to serve this warrant

*Geo: Herrick Marshall of Essex

(Reverse) I have prosecutted the within written warant and have apprehended the person of the within mentioned Suzannah Roots and Brought her befour awthority. 23: may 1692

By me *Jonathan Biles Constible of Beverly

( Essex County Archives, Salem — Witchcraft Vol. 1 Page 133 )

( Andrew Elliott v. Susannah Roots )

An information if it might be any help in the examination of the person before you goode Roots I being in the house of Mr Laurence Denni’s some time since she was suspected for what shee is now before you & there was Likewise Leonard Austen of our Town of Beverly s’d Austen then s’d that he thought she was a bad woman, his reason was that he Living in the house with s’d Roots not Long since and when he went to prayer at any time with his wife & thought s’d Roots would acompany them in s’d Duty but Did not at any time but would withdraw & absent herselfe: & further when my self were gone to bed & she unto her bed. she would rise in the night & we Could hear her talk in the roome below I lying in the Chamber over s’d roome as if there #[there] were: 5: or six persons with her more s’d Austen might speak if caled thereunto as far as know more concer[n]ing Roots

*Andrew Eliott
(Reverse)
Andrew Elliot ag’t G. Roots
( Essex County Archives, Salem — Witchcraft Vol. 1 Page 133 )
Complaint Letter

Susannah was eventually released, but while she was in prison, her grandson John Lovett III visited her and gave the following deposition about his conversation with Dorcas Hoar, another prisoner:

The depersision of John Lovet aged about 25 years this deponant tetifieth & say that he the s’d deponant sume time in June last past went into the prisan to see my gran mother then goodee hore asked me the s’d. deponant whether I knew of any witnesses that would Come in or be brought in against hear.&.I the s’d deponant told her I did not know of any and then the s’d. hore asked me whether goodman witreg would not Come in against her about his Cow I the s’d debonant tould the s’d whore I did believe he Would the s’d whore replyed she did not know that he had ara Cow, furder saith not 

Supposedly Susannah was released due to insufficient evidence but died less than a month later.   Susannah ended up in the care of Ambrose Gale after Josiah died since she had no known family members who survived her. However, the arrangement was not without a business-like aspect. In June of 1684, the court ordered that Susannah’s inheritance should be given to Gale to reimburse him for expenses. It was agreed that with the transfer of her assets, Gale would care for her for the rest of her life. (Note: Susannah was the mother of Ambrose Gale’s deceased son-in-law, Thomas Rootes, husband of Elizabeth Gale.   Not much is known about how she died.  Maybe her decline in health and the conditions in jail made her too weak. 

A student essay submitted in the UK states an interesting theory:

“Some of the witches like Susannah Roots were also accused for entertaining people late at night or adultery, but just because they did those kinds of things did not mean they were looking for power or attention from the whole town, but from the people they did it with. What we know now that did not know then is that the accused must have had been sick in some way or form. We can conclude this with the fact that the symptoms of witchery are the same symptoms as the Encephalitis Epidemic that accrued in the early 1900s to the mid-1900s.” https://www.ukessays.com/essays/history/salem-witch-craft-hysteria-history-essay.php

The entire case of the Witch Trials can be found here for anyone interested.

By the way, dear family members.  This is on the Logan side of the family.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Timothy Tynes Frees 81 Slaves

On January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation. However, before that, the Manumission Act was enacted in Virginia in 1782, allowing slaveholders to set slaves free in their wills.

My 1st cousin, 8x removed, did just that.

Timothy Tynes was one of the richest men in Isle of Wight, Virginia. His father, Robert Tynes, had accumulated a fortune in lands and business transactions. He built a plantation home in 1750 that still stands today. When Robert died in 1794, he left “all my whole Estate, both real and Personal,” to Timothy, his sole surviving son.

Timothy never married; he lived with some of his many slaves in the house his father had built, just outside Smithfield, where he managed his many inherited plantations. His parents and his brothers and sisters pre-deceased him. When he died, his nieces and nephews expected Robert’s great wealth to be distributed among them.

Timothy, however, had other ideas. Upon his death in 1802, his will freed every one of his 81 slaves by name and gave most of the land to them. A niece, Sarah Tynes Purdie, received one plantation, and a cousin’s son was left some land; the rest of Robert’s descendants got nothing.

Photo taken by Hope Stanley (whose husband Charles is a descendant of Robert and Mary Tynes) in February 2000, at a time when the home was for sale and visitors allowed.

Timothy Tynes’s will gives special treatment to a slave named Beck (Rebecca) and her children, suggesting that these may have been Timothy’s own offspring. Beck’s son, John, inherits an entire river plantation. Timothy also singles out slaves named Sukey, Prince, Tim, Sam, Dick Unge, and Little Charles for bequests of land or money. The rest of the freed slaves are to share a large tract of land, of which Dick Unge has been given 100 acres.

These families flourished, building homesteads, farming, and working the water in the community. Today, many descendants of the Tynes families are in Isle of Wight County.

You can view pictures of the Tynes Plantation at https://tinyurl.com/TynesPlantation.

A lot of my information comes from

https://www.dhr.virginia.gov/historic-registers/046-0002/

and

https://www.historicisleofwight.com/the-african-american-experience-in-isle-of-wight-county.html

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Checking In

Photo by SzaboViktor on Unsplah

Hello Followers. I wanted to check in with you since I have not written a blog in quite some time. The last real blog was March 19, so almost a month now. Like you, my family has been self-isolating. Not only from the virus but the crazier people who do not think it is a serious threat.


My son and I are both essential works so we have been working except for my Easter vacation. I am working four hours in the office and four hours at home. My son works all day in the warehouse. Neither of our companies allows outside visitors. We are both very careful as my mother, who is in her late 70s, lives with us.


Since I am working from home I have not had a lot of the extra family history time I see a lot of people talking about. But, I have tried to take advantage of the free sites and free records that have become available. It’s funny, some of the records I have run across have names that I could have used a couple of years ago. But, now I at least know I am on the right track.

I did have success with my 80 year old uncle’s tree. Back on Thanksgiving he was telling me about his brick wall with his grandparents on his mother’s side. Her father seems to have disappeared after deserting her and her brothers. The name he always went by with this family seems to actually be a nickname. In tracing the date of birth and his birthplace, we tracked down what we think is his real name.

With the help of the West Virginia Archives and History Library, we followed these coincidences and found all kinds of information on his family. But, until we find a document where he uses his nickname along with his real name, we cannot be 100% sure it is him. Or, until we can find some DNA matches. Once we entered his real name into our database, a whole slew of information and family members popped up. Including others on their public trees who seemed to have come to the same conclusion. And, here’s the kicker, it seems there is another family who this man deserted…under his real name. We hope to connect to this family to find some answers.

West Virginia Archives and History Photo Gallery


I’ve also been doing a lot of gardening, my other great passion. We had some umbrella palms start to take over so we had them pulled out, by the root balls. Little did I know a few years after I planted them, they would become evasive! They loved the wet clay soil, too much! I’ve since been filling the spaces in with some organic matter from my compost pile. I’ve also added a few pieces of cardboard and will mulch and soil over that. It’s like having a blank canvas to start planting in.

And, my flowers are blooming. Always a welcome sight and lifts the spirits. My garden is defintely a great boost for my mental health.


I cannot seem to concentrate enough to pull an ancestor story together for a blog, but I did want to check-in. I hope that you and your family are safe and well. As our ancestors did from their pandemics, this too shall pass.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Finding Abigail… Part 2 (Logan Family)

Photo by Harold Wijnholds on Unsplash

Finding Abigail has proven to be a significant challenge. As I wrote in Finding Abigail… Part 1, her last name has been elusive. I have been tracking my research about her through the research logs, and here is what I have.

Date Contacted-Who Contacted-Why Contacted- Response

  • 12/2/2019 City of Danbury, CT Abigail Soper They wrote back and said, “Certifiable records began in 1840.”
  • 12/26/2019 Dorset Historical Society Proof of Abigail’s assumed last name of Soper My email:  I was hoping you could please do a preliminary search and let me know if you have any information on the Soper family. My main search is for an Abigail Soper who married Daniel Logan, about 1780, my 4th great grandparents. It is stated, but not sourced that Abigail’s father was Samuel Soper. Supposedly a Hugh Logan married Abigail’s sister, Jemima, about 1784. And, Lucy Logan (Hugh’s sister) married their brother, William, about 1797. I have contacted a few county clerks, but they do not have these earlier records. Any help or direction is much appreciated.
  • 12/27/2019 Dorset Historical Society His response:   I checked through our archives and could not find any information to tie Samuel Soper to Abigail Soper Logan. I did find some tidbits which may be of use.

          According to the History of Danby, Joseph Soper was the first settler of Danby, in 1765, and two of his (unnamed) brothers settled in Dorset. They came from Nine Partners, New York.

         According to a genealogy of the Allen family, “Seth Allen was born 16 Jan 1733/34 in Dartmouth, Bristol, Mass., and died Aft. 1801. He married Anna Soper Abt. 1752 in Dutchess County, N.Y., daughter of Peletiah Soper and Martha Soper. She was born 06 Feb 1734/35 in Windsor, Hartford, Ct. and died after 1801.” Seth and Anna bought land in Danby in 1769, which they sold in 1770, when they were in Manchester. They bought land in Manchester in 1773 from Peletiah Soper. After that, things get murkier, but they probably lived in East Dorset around 1800, and in Bromley, Vt. after 1800 (Bromley later changed its’ name to Peru).

          “The Marriage Records of John Strong” records the wedding on September 5, 1782 of Robert Allen and Patty Soper of Dorset.

         Several records say that the Soper Tavern was in South Dorset, at the intersection of modern-day Route 30 and Cross Road. None of the records give the first names of people who operated the tavern.

          The Dorset Church records record the baptism of “Mrs. Samuel Soper 1803-04.”

          Last, Rev. Parsons Pratt, in his genealogical records, noted that other Soper family members settled in “Brandon and other northern [Vermont] towns.

          Like I said, nothing specific to your request, but I hope some of this scattershot information proves useful in your quest.

                        Sincerely yours,

                        Jon Mathewson

                        Curator

  • 12/25/2019 Random Acts of Genealogical Kindness https://raogk.org/ Any Soper info Raymond Toolan from RAOGK emailed me back (his words)    

                        I have done some looking and have found at least one extended family of Sopers from the mid-18th century in the towns of Dorset and Manchester in Bennington County. Your Abigail creates a bit of a problem. Remember the brief history lesson I gave you? In 1765 the French and Indian Wars had only ended two years previous. This means that England had new land it needed to quantify. The colonies of New York and New Hampshire felt that each of their grants gave them most or all of this former French territory as part of their landholdings. Each colony sent surveyors in to lay out grants. An early Vermont land speculator, Ethan Allen and his brother Ira preferred to deal with the governor of New Hampshire and so they formed The Green Mountain Boys, an ad hoc group of vigilantes whose mission was to force the New York surveyors and tax collectors out in favor of New Hampshire. There is some argument as to how successful they may have been. History remembers this group regarding their taking over Ft Ticonderoga in NY. The point in this is that in 1765 those towns were most likely considered part of NY as Vermont, per se, did not exist at that time. Middlebury, Vermont, is a bit north in Addison County, also on the west side of the Green Mountains, and also was most likely considered part of NY before 1777. I will see if I can find anything that connects Abigail to this family in Dorset and Manchester. You might see if you can get the contact information for the town’s historical society in Dorset and Manchester, Vermont. Every town has a historical society, and some are more active than others.

  • 12/24/2019       The period in history that is involved here is a tough one for research in Vermont. Initially, the area, including Vermont, was under French control. After the battle on the Plains of Abraham in Quebec [ending the French and Indian wars], the area became part of the English holdings. Both the colonies of New York and New Hampshire claimed all or part of the land between them. While they were still arguing, the War of Independence broke out in 1776. IN 1777, the residents of the land area between Lake Champlain and the Connecticut River declared themselves an independent republic. This lasted until 1791 when Vermont was admitted as the 14th state. All record-keeping was done at the office of the town clerk. It still is. The recording of births, marriages, and deaths varied from town to town and really was not codified until around 1865. Copies of the various records were not collected at a central archive until around 1911. I will see if I can find any sort of documentation for you, but, honestly, the odds are very slim.

        FYI, the clerks of the courts cannot really assist you as other than records of divorces or other court-related issues they have no records. Births, deaths, and marriages are all with the town clerks and at the archive in Middlesex. There are 254 towns, cities, gores, and grants in Vermont, each with its own clerk.

  • 12/26/2019 Manchester Historical Society Vermont Soper Emailed them, have not received a response as of 1/4/2020
  • 1/18/20 Marlin Logan Emailed Marlin and asked if he had sources on his information for Soper.  
  • 1/19/20 Manchester Historical Society Vermont Soper and Logan Emailed them again
  • 1/19/20 Dorset Historical Society Soper and Logan Emailed them on information for Soper
  • 1/22/20 Email from Marlin Logan

Hi Marlee

Went back to all my old records and so sorry I don’t have anymore information than is on my Family Tree.

Tried unsuccessfully to check other resources also and I come up with a blank.

You have sparked my interest again so will keep your request as I update and find new information.  Hopefully we can find a little more data than we have.

Good hunting.

Marlin

As you can see, I do not know much more than I did when I started. But, tracking my inquiries on this log will keep me from repeating quests.  

I may look into the other Soper’s mentioned and see if I can find any Abigail’s in their lines.               

As you can see, we all have brick walls in our family history. I may be able to help with yours. Contact me for your some virtual family history tutoring.

What is Virtual tutoring?
* Individual screen shares- a virtual whiteboard to work on:
* Family tree creation.
* Records search for documenting your family history.
* Get help to break down brick walls on a particular ancestor.
http://loganalogy.com/genealogy-classes/

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.